Mediation for medical malpractice actions: an efficient approach to the law and veterinary care
نویسندگان
چکیده
Veterinarians today face an increased risk for malpractice claims in view of increased client awareness of the benefits of the human-animal bond and advances in preventive and specialized veterinary medicine. An important problem with medical malpractice litigation is the manner in which malpractice claims are resolved. In several countries, thousands of claims have been successfully resolved via Alternative Dispute Resolution processes such as mediation, conciliation and arbitration. In medical mediation, health care providers, patients/animal owners, families, clergy and attorneys participate directly in an informal, usually voluntary, dispute resolution process that can lead to for unique and promising approaches to resolving conflicts. Recently in Italy framework legislation addressing mediation has been introduced and it is also used to resolve medical malpractice disputes. Given that in Italy medical mediation is formally a new concept and is still evolving, an examination is made. The importance of “mediation” for veterinarians’ civil liability will be evaluated, underlining how it could become an important instrument in speeding up the resolution of court actions concerning medical malpractice.
منابع مشابه
The practice of mediation to resolve clinical, bioethical, and medical malpractice disputes.
Mediation is a voluntary process whereby a neutral and impartial third party-t-he mediator--is present to facilitate communication and negotiation between the disputing parties so that amicable settlements can be agreed. Being confidential and non-adversarial in nature, the mediation process and skills are particularly applicable in clinical practice to facilitate challenging communications fol...
متن کاملMediation and medical malpractice: problems with definition and implementation.
An important aspect of the perceived problem with medical malpractice litigation is the manner in which malpractice claims are resolved.' Following the first medical malpractice crisis in the mid-1970s and the more recent difficulties with insurance costs and availability, the majority of states enacted legislation affecting the procedures used to resolve malpractice claims. 2 Procedural reform...
متن کاملA consumer perspective on medical malpractice.
In 1975, and now again in 1985, there has arisen a public perception of a "malpractice crisis." ' The crisis, then and now, principally troubles physicians, who believe that liability insurance premiums are too high. A crisis seen through the eyes of doctors and measured in premium dollars naturally generates responses evaluated in terms of effect on premiums. The needs of patients and consumer...
متن کاملExamination of Post-Treatment Indicators of Physicians’ Responsibility
Efforts of the medical staff are to provide efficient, desirable, and high quality services to patients. However, medical treatments are not immune to error and mistake. So, occurrence of injury following medical managements is inevitable, an issue that could lead to a lawsuit against the medical staff. In such cases, resorting to experts’ opinion is necessary. Therefore, knowledge about effec...
متن کاملMedical error and its proceeding in French law
In French law, medical error proceeding has undergone many developments, and at present in this country a comprehensive medical compensation system is designed to address both patient rights and physician concerns about the costs of compensation. Contrary to traditional French law and the general classification of medical services in a public or private hospital, a new legal regime has been ado...
متن کامل